Happiness by Design
HUDSON STREET PRESS
Published by the Penguin Group
Penguin Group (USA) LLC
375 Hudson Street
New York, New York 10014
USA | Canada | UK | Ireland | Australia | New Zealand | India | South Africa | China
penguin.com
A Penguin Random House Company
First published by Hudson Street Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) LLC, 2014
Copyright © 2014 by Paul Dolan
Penguin supports copyright. Copyright fuels creativity, encourages diverse voices, promotes free speech, and creates a vibrant culture. Thank you for buying an authorized edition of this book and for complying with copyright laws by not reproducing, scanning, or distributing any part of it in any form without permission. You are supporting writers and allowing Penguin to continue to publish books for every reader.
REGISTERED TRADEMARK—MARCA REGISTRADA
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA
Dolan, Paul, 1968–
Happiness by design : change what you do, not how you think / Paul Dolan, PhD ; foreword by Daniel Kahneman.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
eBook ISBN 978-0-698-15692-0
1. Happiness—Psychological aspects. I. Title.
BF575.H27D65 2014
158—dc23 2014004748
While the author has made every effort to provide accurate telephone numbers, Internet addresses, and other contact information at the time of publication, neither the publisher nor the author assumes any responsibility for errors or for changes that occur after publication. Further, publisher does not have any control over and does not assume any responsibility for author or third-party Web sites or their content.
Version_1
Contents
Title Page
Copyright
Foreword
A note to the reader
A little warm-up
Introduction: stuttering into happiness
PART 1: Developing Happiness
1. What is happiness?
Happiness as evaluation
Happiness as feelings
The pleasure-purpose principle
The PPP for life
2. What do we know about happiness?
Experience sampling
German days
American episodes
Other evidence on happiness
The measure matters
3. What causes happiness?
From widgets to happiness
Above and below the surface
Behavioral spillovers
The shifting sands of attention
Attending to happiness
4. Why aren’t we happier?
Mistaken desires
Mistaken projections
Mistaken beliefs
Reallocating attention
PART 2: Delivering Happiness
5. Deciding happiness
Pay attention to your own feedback
Pay attention to the feedback of others
Don’t try too hard
Happier by deciding
6. Designing happiness
Priming
Defaults
Commitments
Social norms
Designing habits
Happier by designing
7. Doing happiness
Pay attention to what you are doing
Pay attention to who you are doing it with
Don’t get distracted
Happier by doing
8. Decide, design, and do
Dither less
Distribute more
Efficient production
Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Notes
Index
Foreword
There are two central issues in the study of happiness (I tend to prefer the label of subjective well-being). The first is a classic distinction, which goes back at least to Aristotle, between two views of the good life: a life of pleasure, contentment, and other positive feelings, or one that is well-lived and meaningful. A clear choice of one over the other has its problems. A preference for joy over meaning gets you labeled a hedonist, which is not a compliment. On the other hand, you are properly called a scold if you proclaim that pleasure is frivolous and that only virtue and meaning matter. How should you define happiness if you wish to be neither a hedonist nor a scold? The other great question about happiness is how to measure it. Should we study how people feel as they go about their life, whether they mostly experience happiness or misery? Or should we ask people to stop and think about their life, and report whether or not they are satisfied with it?
The two questions appear to be related. It seems natural to use measurements of life satisfaction to study whether people find meaning in their life, and to identify happy feelings by measuring ongoing experience. That was also my view for many years, but Paul Dolan has a different idea. To begin with, he is much more interested in people’s experiences of life than in their evaluations of their life. The novel idea is to consider “meaningful” and “meaningless” as experiences, not judgments. Activities, in his view, differ in a subjective experience of purposefulness—volunteer work is associated with a sense of purpose that channel-surfing lacks. For Dolan, purpose and pleasure are both basic constituents of happiness. This is a bold and original move.
The question “What does happiness consist of?” is not answered by listing facts about happiness. It is about the proper use of the word: when people speak of “happiness,” what do they have in mind? No answer can be completely satisfactory, because people do not always have the same idea in mind when they use the word. Among the imperfect definitions of happiness, the pleasure-purpose concept that Dolan offers is, I believe, a strong contender. It is a good description of what I wish for my grandchildren: a life that is rich in activities that are both pleasurable and meaningful.
Paul Dolan is an inveterate optimist who has overcome many obstacles on his way to becoming an internationally recognized expert on well-being. The optimism shows on every page of this book. In particular, Paul is optimistic about you, his reader. He believes that you can make your life both pleasurable and meaningful with deliberate choices, about the environment you create for yourself and about the aspects of life that deserve your attention. He offers a great deal of sound advice on how to make these choices and how to follow through with them. The rest, he says, is up to you.
Daniel Kahneman
A note to the reader
I’d like to thank you for buying my book. It makes me happy, and I hope it will make you happy, too. I’m fascinated by happiness and human behavior, professionally and personally, and I get plenty of opportunities to fuel my fascination. Before writing an entire book on happiness, I was asked to devise the questions that are now being used in large surveys of happiness in the UK and also to advise the UK government on how to design better behavior change interventions. I am now increasingly being asked to advise charities, multinational companies, and other governments about how they can improve happiness and influence behavior.
My professional fascination with happiness came about largely by chance. I had spent a decade conducting academic research into how we should measure and value the benefits of health care spending. This work was recognized with a Philip Leverhulme Prize in 2002 for my contribution to health economics, which meant that I could take some time out from teaching at the Univ
ersity of Sheffield and attend a few conferences. One such conference, on the economics of happiness and held in Milan in March 2003, turned out to be the most significant event of my academic life. On the way to the conference dinner, I sat next to a man who introduced himself as Daniel (Danny) Kahneman. I knew exactly who he was. As many of you know, too, Danny is a psychologist who won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002. He has subsequently written Thinking, Fast and Slow, which is a brilliant book about human behavior and decision making.
Danny was immediately engaging and interested to hear about what I was working on. After a few minutes, he said, “Why not come to Princeton [where he worked] and we can work together?” I thought about that for about a nanosecond and said, “Yes, please.” Beyond being one of the nicest people I have ever met, Danny is my intellectual hero. In fact, that whole conference was pretty life changing as I also met Richard Layard, one of the most famous happiness researchers in the world and author of Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Richard was instrumental in my move to the London School of Economics in 2010.
Since meeting Danny and Richard, I have been conducting research into happiness and its causes. Sometimes this has involved analyzing existing data sets; other times it requires me to gather my own data. This has quite naturally led to research into understanding human behavior, using experiments conducted in the lab and in the real world. A large part of how you feel is determined by what you do, what you do is largely motivated by the expected impact on your happiness, and happiness is the feedback you receive about the impact of what you do. You can see how it’s all very cyclical.
As one of the small number of researchers working on both happiness and behavior, one of the main aims of this book is to demonstrate the links between these two research fields, and in so doing to bring the latest insights from happiness research and behavioral science to bear directly on the questions of what you are trying to achieve (more happiness) and how you can bring it about (by behaving differently). I was trained as an economist but I am now a professor of behavioral science, which probably gives me more in common with psychologists these days. My research, and now this book, seeks to combine the best bits from these two disciplines: the formal and explicit consideration of costs and benefits from economics alongside the recognition from psychology that our behavior is heavily influenced by context and situation.
I also bring a distinctive personal perspective to the book. My dad had many low- or semiskilled manual jobs over the years, and my mum worked in clerical roles to supplement the family income. I grew up in social housing and attended run-of-the-mill state schools. Money was tight, but not too tight to mention. We did not go on holiday very often, but my parents made sure we were always well fed and wore pretty decent clothes, too. Many of my current friends have not attended university, while others have had privileged backgrounds. I therefore continue to have experiences that are different from many of those who write about human happiness and behavior. A good understanding of the academic research matters, but so, too, does a little knowledge of the complexities and quirks of the real lives of people from a range of different backgrounds.
As I’m sure you are only too well aware, managing other people’s expectations of you is an important skill, and so I won’t make any promises to change your life; but I do hope to provide some insights into how you can change what you do. Behavioral science teaches us that what you are told matters a bit but who it is that tells you matters a lot. You listen more to some people than to others. Ideally, good messengers have three attributes: they can be trusted; they are experts; and they are like you. As a consequence of my academic work and my personal background, I would like to think I have all three attributes. All the more reason to pay attention to what follows.
A little warm-up
Before we move ahead, I’d like you to look at the following list of twenty items that could potentially make you happier.
From this list, what are the four items that would make you happiest? Place an X in the “make me happiest” column alongside the four items. For each of the four items you chose, please rate how difficult it would be to achieve on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents “not at all difficult” and 10 means “very difficult indeed.”
You might want to keep your selections in the back of your head as you read on.
Make me happiest
Difficulty in achieving (0–10)
1
More money
2
New experiences
3
Children
4
More time with the kids
5
The kids leaving home
6
A new partner
7
More sleep
8
More sex
9
A shorter commute
10
More time with friends
11
A new house
12
A new job
13
A new boss
14
New work colleagues
15
More exercise
16
To be healthier
17
To be slimmer
18
To stop smoking
19
More holidays
20
A pet
Introduction
Stuttering into happiness
Here’s a confession that until recently I would have made only to my family and very close friends. I have a stammer (or stutter, if you prefer; they mean the same thing). It has probably been the single biggest blot on my landscape of happiness. It has been with me all my life and it has always affected me, despite my largely successful attempts to keep it hidden.
My mother took me to see a speech therapist when I was about seven years old and I was told that I would grow out of it. My stammer was especially awful when I was a teenager. I couldn’t say my name. I hated using the phone. Any small speaking situation that nonstammerers take for granted brought on severe anxiety attacks before and during the event, and feelings of utter despair afterward.
The reason a stammer is such a problem is because it is the perfect attention-grabbing condition. It is the focus of a great deal of attention for the stammerer, and it draws attention to itself every time a speaking situation arises. As any stammerer will tell you, its frequency and severity are variable and so it takes a lot of what I shall call “attentional energy.” If I had always stammered on every sixth word, say, I would not have attended to it anywhere near as much; and others would soon have become used to the pattern, too. Uncertainty grabs your attention, just as noises that occur at random (car horns, say) will attract your attention more than noises that are predictable (a ticking clock).
A stammer is also pretty difficult to explain, since the causes of stammering have not been fully established.1 You generally pay more attention to stimuli that you can’t explain; you will pay more attention to a pain in your leg, for example, if you do not know why it hurts compared to if you know it is because you fell off your bicycle a few days ago.2
Even those
whose stammer is not too severe on the surface experience considerable anxiety below the surface, as they think about when their next disfluency will arise. My own disfluency typically manifests itself as “blocks,” involuntary silent pauses in which I am unable to produce sounds and which, in those moments, feel like they last forever. Needless to say, there is a considerable fear of stammering. As if all that isn’t enough, we stammerers also think that other people are paying a great deal of attention to our speech and that we are being judged harshly as a result. The only comforting thing was knowing that I would grow out of it. If only.
It took a disastrous seminar presentation as a final-year undergraduate to make me realize that my stammer was not going to simply disappear on its own. As a stammerer I had become a master at avoiding public speaking, and so that presentation was my first ever. Lots of people dread public speaking, of course, but this fear is magnified many times over in the minds of a stammerer. A year later, as a graduate student in York when I was twenty-two, I went to see a more enlightened speech therapist than the one my mother took me to, and she taught me controlled speech. This consisted of starting my sentences very softly, speaking slowly, and envisioning my words as seamlessly linked together. I was still a long way from being “fluent,” but it did give me the confidence to start speaking publicly. I began increasingly to put myself into stressful speaking situations, to confront my fear, and found myself a lectureship.
Over time I became more willing to do public speaking events and worried about them less. I paid much less attention to the fear of speaking. I have dreaded many of these events but I genuinely cannot recall one that went as badly as I thought it might. Over the last couple of decades, I’ve become very proud of developing a general “fight” approach to my stammer, and I have actively sought out challenging but purposeful activities, like public speaking.